Unfair Dismissals Under the New Labour Government

  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Unfair Dismissals Under the...

 

The recent proposed changes announced by the new Labour government mark a significant shift in employment law in the UK, particularly in relation to unfair dismissal. As part of their commitment to enhancing worker rights, the government has introduced several key reforms, the most notable being the removal of the minimum service requirement for bringing claims of unfair dismissal. This change is expected to have profound implications for both employers and employees across the country.

Basic Individual Rights from Day 1

UKrights, government, protections

Quote from Keir Starmer on Day 1 Rights.

One of the most impactful changes under the proposed reform is the extension of basic individual rights from the very first day of employment. Currently, certain rights such as protection from unfair dismissal, eligibility for parental leave, and entitlement to sick pay were contingent upon a minimum period of continuous service. This minimum period often acted as a barrier for new employees, preventing them from challenging unfair practices or seeking essential benefits.

The End of the Two-Year Minimum Service Requirement

Historically, the law has required employees to have a minimum service period before they could bring a claim for unfair dismissal. This requirement has fluctuated over the years but has generally stood at around two years.

With the abolition of this requirement, any employee can now lodge a claim for unfair dismissal from the first day of their employment. This change aims to protect workers from arbitrary or unjust dismissals and provides a more level playing field for all employees, particularly those in precarious or short-term employment.

Potential Employer Reactions

This reform may lead some employers to take pre-emptive action before the laws come into effect. There is a concern that some companies might rush to dismiss employees who are close to reaching the two-year mark or those whom they are uncertain about retaining in the long term. This period of transition could see a spike in dismissals as businesses adjust to the new legal terrain.

Currently, it is more straightforward and less costly for employers to dismiss employees with less than two years of service, as they do not yet qualify for certain protections. However, with the new rules, employers will need to exercise greater caution in their decision-making processes to avoid potential legal challenges from the outset.

The Historical Context

The concept of qualifying service for unfair dismissal protection has been a cornerstone of UK employment law since the Industrial Relations Act 1971. Initially set at two years, this requirement has been adjusted over time but has never been eliminated entirely. The Labour government's decision to remove it marks a historic shift, reflecting a broader trend towards strengthening worker rights and protections.

Looking Ahead

When or if these new laws take effect, both employers and employees will need to adapt. For employees, this change brings greater security and the assurance that they are protected from the outset. For employers, it necessitates a careful reassessment of employment practices and policies to ensure compliance with the new regulations.

Ultimately, the removal of the two-year minimum service requirement for unfair dismissal claims represents a significant step towards more equitable workplace protections. It underscores the Labour government's commitment to enhancing worker rights and ensuring that all employees, regardless of tenure, are treated with fairness and respect. As these changes unfold, it will be crucial for all parties to stay informed and prepared for the new era of employment law in the UK.

Are you for or against this proposed reform?

Share your thoughts below.

Related articles:

The Human Side of Restructuring

Common Mistakes in Recording Dismissal Dates

 

Some businesses we have worked with